<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Accountability Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/</link>
	<description>Life is great, and it only gets better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lunt</title>
		<link>http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Roger, thanks for the additional suggestions.  I really like the idea of planning a future retrospection meeting as a way to deal with this situation in constructive manner.  Iâ€™ll be looking for a time to test this idea in the near future.  :-)

Just to clarify, I wasnâ€™t proposing complete rejection when one&#039;s opinions do not match the consensus, and offering the retrospection meeting is definitely another acceptable course of action.  While many options exist when we are placed in a situation where we donâ€™t agree, simply sending a CYA email is the one thatâ€™s a waste of time, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, thanks for the additional suggestions.  I really like the idea of planning a future retrospection meeting as a way to deal with this situation in constructive manner.  Iâ€™ll be looking for a time to test this idea in the near future.  <img src='http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just to clarify, I wasnâ€™t proposing complete rejection when one&#8217;s opinions do not match the consensus, and offering the retrospection meeting is definitely another acceptable course of action.  While many options exist when we are placed in a situation where we donâ€™t agree, simply sending a CYA email is the one thatâ€™s a waste of time, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger L. Cauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger L. Cauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikelunt.com/blog/2006/09/26/the-accountability-myth/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, to be realistic and constructive, I go along with decision with which I do not agree.  In such cases, my favorite course of action is to:

1.  State my objection and the reasons for it.
2.  State that I don&#039;t want to stand in the way of progress, so I am willing to go along with a consensus decision.
3.  In a noncontrontational manner, request that the stakeholders and decision-makers review their decision at a future date to learn from it.
4.  Have the lead decision-maker set an Outlook appointment for this evaluation date.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, to be realistic and constructive, I go along with decision with which I do not agree.  In such cases, my favorite course of action is to:</p>
<p>1.  State my objection and the reasons for it.<br />
2.  State that I don&#8217;t want to stand in the way of progress, so I am willing to go along with a consensus decision.<br />
3.  In a noncontrontational manner, request that the stakeholders and decision-makers review their decision at a future date to learn from it.<br />
4.  Have the lead decision-maker set an Outlook appointment for this evaluation date.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
